EKLIPSE produces various kinds of outputs as a result of the requests we manage, including guidance notes, reports, scientific articles and presentations. These are shown below according to the process or request from which they arose.


EKLIPSE Guidance notes

These guidance notes describe the main groups of people and the activities they conduct as part of the EKLIPSE process:


Nature-based Solutions to Promote Climate Resilience in Urban Areas

Report: EKLIPSE has published the report from its first request from policy makers for synthesizing available knowledge: Nature-based solutions to promote climate resilience in urban areas – developing an impact evaluation framework. 

Article: Some of the EKLIPSE Expert Working Group members have also published the following article:   

Raymond et al. (2017) A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environmental Science & Policy, 77: 15-24

In this paper, we developed a holistic framework for assessing co-benefits (and costs) of nature-based solutions and developed and proposed a seven-stage process for situating co-benefit assessment within policy and project implementation.  We found that nature-based solutions can have environmental, social and economic co-benefits and/or costs both within and across these 10 societal challenges. On that base, we develop and propose a seven-stage process for situating co-benefit assessment within policy and project implementation. The seven stages include: 1) identify problem or opportunity; 2) select and assess NBS and related actions; 3) design NBS implementation processes; 4) implement NBS; 5) frequently engage stakeholders and communicate co-benefits; 6) transfer and upscale NBS; and 7) monitor and evaluate co-benefits across all stages. We conclude that the developed framework together with the seven-stage co-benefit assessment process represent a valuable tool for guiding thinking and identifying the multiple values of NBS implementation. 

This journal article was prepared by some members of the of the EKLIPSE Expert Working Group on NBS to Promote Climate Resilience as a separate activity to the EKLIPSE NBS report.  We acknowledge important contributions of the EKLIPSE Expert Working Group on NBS to Promote Climate Resilience in Urban Areas in the identification of actions, indicators and methods underpinning the assessment framework. We would like to thank the EU FP7 IMPRESSIONS project (Grant No. 603416) for funding the design of the figures and tables. This work was financially supported by GREEN SURGE, EU FP7 collaborative project, FP7-ENV.2013.6.2-5-603567 and by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS −UEFISCDI, project number PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4-0434. Author Dr. Frantzeskaki Niki was also supported by the ARTS Project (Accelerating and Rescaling Sustainability Transitions) funded by the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) (Grand No 603654).


Social Innovation and Nature-based Solutions (NBS)

In December 2016, EKLIPSE, EPBRS and BiodivERsA jointly organised a participatory foresight workshop in Brussels to discuss research needed to face future societal challenges and emerging issues. 

The workshop resulted in a presentationmain report with annexes, and a policy brief summarising key recommendations for science policy on NBS and social innovation.

Read more about the foresight workshop here.


Understanding Jointly the Purpose of EKLIPSE and How We Can All Make a Difference

This EKLIPSE presentation explains the various important reasons why EKLIPSE is needed, who should get involved and how EKLIPSE works.  


Knowledge Synthesis Methods

The Expert Group on Knowledge Synthesis Methods has identified 21 types of knowledge synthesis methods which will be used to identify and characterise robust evidence and knowledge gaps, in response to requests to EKLIPSE from policy makers and societal actors. 

The group has produced a report covering existing methods, and providing guidance on their selection, use and development. 

The group has also produced 21 guidance notes which very briefly describe each method and list its strengths and weaknesses; they also provide key references and examples of where a method has been used for policy decisions. For the overall context we recommend reading the complete report.

Read more about the Expert Methods Group here.